For the fans that never miss a game. Who pour over stats and know Kobe is coming in at the 8 minute mark.

Best Teams in the NBA — April 18th

Posted: April 18th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Best Teams In The NBA, Standings, Team | No Comments »

Now that the real season is underway, everyone wants to know what it takes to win in the playoffs. I have preached all year that it is easy to separate the pretenders from the contenders. The key is focusing on two things:

  1. How does your team perform against the best teams in the league (those above .500)
  2. Can they win on the road

In order to move on in the playoffs, a team usually has to find a way to win on the road.

Here is the final entry for the Best Teams in the NBA.

The Bulls finished the season at .500 thanks to a nice finish, so they are now included in the teams above .500, obviously. I also kept the Pistons in it and while they may have finished the season below .500, they still made the playoffs.

The Nuggets finished in the second spot out West, while the Blazers are the hot young team that all the experts are picking to go far (even though they lost a big one on their home floor tonight vs the Rockets).

Without further adieu, here are the numbers:

Vs +.500 Teams

  • Cavs    31-12 (.720)
  • Lakers  32-13 (.711)
  • Celtics  31-14 (.689)
  • Magic  27-16 (.628)
  • Nuggets  23-23 (.500)
  • Spurs   23-22 (.511)
  • Blazers 23-23 (.500)

*Interestingly, the teams that had the best records also had the best records vs teams over .500, with the Cavs on top. 

Stats vs +.500 Teams

  • Cavs       PPG 97.9       Opp PPG 92.0   Point Differential +5.9
  • Lakers    PPG 103.3     Opp PPG 97.9   Point Differential +5.4
  • Celtics    PPG 98.1       Opp PPG 92.1   Point Differential +6.0
  • Magic     PPG 98.0       Opp PPG 95.0   Point Differential +3.0
  • Nuggets  PPG 98.0       Opp PPG 99.8   Point Differential -1.7
  • Spurs     PPG 93.5       Opp PPG 95.0   Point Differential -1.5
  • Blazers   PPG 97.7       Opp PPG 95.7   Point Differential +2.0

*Just going by record and the stats against the top teams in the league, it is hard to imagine the Nuggets, Spurs, or Blazers going far, as they all play around .500 ball vs the good teams.

Road Wins vs +.500 Teams:

  • Cavs Total of 12      (DAL, CHI, PHI (2), DEN, POR, UTA, DET, SAS, ATL, MIA, PHO)
  • Lakers Total of 13   (DEN, DAL, NOH (2), PHO, PHI, HOU (2), BOS, CLE, SAS, DET, CHI)
  • Celtics Total of 14 (HOU, DET (2), ATL (2), MIA, ORL, PHI (2), NOH, DAL, PHO, DEN, SAS)
  • Magic Total of 13  (DAL, PHI (2), POR, UTA, CHI, ATL (2), SAS, LAL, DEN, BOS, MIA) 
  • Nuggets Total of 8    (BOS, SAS, DAL (2), MIA, ORL, PHI, NOH)
  • Spurs Total of 11    (DEN, DAL, PHO (2) MIA, CHI, UTA, BOS, DET, HOU, ATL)
  • Blazers Total of 6    (ORL, MIA, DET, CHI, NOH, SAS)

*I think this is a great measure of a teams’ toughness and fortitude. The Blazers are a fine example of a pretender. They are amazing at home, but they struggle to win meaningful games on the road (although the win in San Antonio was a nice one), having only won six games vs +.500 teams on the road.

Vs Each Other

  • Cavs     7-6  (1-2 vs BOS; 0-2 vs LAL; 1-2 vs ORL; 1-0 vs SAS; 2-0 vs POR; 2-0 vs DEN)
  • Lakers  11-6  (2-0 vs BOS; 2-0 vs CLE; 0-2 vs ORL; 2-1 vs SAS; 2-2 vs POR; 3-1 vs DEN)
  • Celtics  7-8  (2-1 vs ORL; 2-2 vs CLE; 0-2 vs LAL; 1-1 vs SAS; 1-1 vs POR; 1-1 vs DEN)
  • Magic   10-5  (2-0 vs LAL; 2-0 vs SAS; 2-1 vs CLE; 2-2 vs BOS; 1-1 vs POR; 1-1 vs DEN)
  • Nuggets  7-10 (1-3 vs LAL; 2-1 vs SAS; 0-2 vs CLE; 1-1 vs BOS; 2-2 vs POR; 1-1 vs ORL)
  • Spurs   4-11  (1-1 vs BOS; 1-2 vs LAL; 0-2 vs ORL; 0-1 vs CLE; 1-3 vs POR; 1-2 vs DEN)
  • Blazers  9-9  (1-1 vs BOS; 2-2 vs LAL; 1-1 vs ORL; 0-2 vs CLE; 3-1 vs SAS; 2-2 vs DEN)

*How does your team do vs the best of the best? Celtics, even with KG, only had a winning record against Orlando, while the Cavs should be worried as they are only 2-6 vs the next top three teams (Lakers, Celtics, Magic). The Lakers and Magic are actually the only ones with impressive records vs the best (the Lakers were 6-1 vs the Cavs, Celtics, and Spurs; the Magic were 6-1 vs the Lakers, Cavs, and Spurs. Nuggets and Spurs fans should be concerned about their inability to play against the best.

Road Record

  • Cavs     27-14 (.659)
  • Lakers  29-12 (.707)
  • Celtics  27-14 (.659)
  • Magic   27-14 (.659)
  • Nuggets  21-20 (.512)
  • Spurs   26-15 (.634)
  • Blazers  20-21 (.488)

*The Lakers were best in the league in the road all season (the two most impressive back to back road wins this season first came in Boston, then Cleveland and later in Houston, then in San Antonio) and ended with more road wins than anyone else. The Nuggets and Blazers are pretenders, while the Cavs, Celtics, and Magic all finished with an impressive 27 road wins, and even the Spurs had 26, showing they can win wherever.

Strength of Schedule, Point Margin, Last 10:

  • Cavs    .498;   +8.93;   7-3
  • Lakers .494;   +7.66;   7-3
  • Celtics .505;   +7.51;   8-2
  • Magic  .497;   +6.70;   5-5
  • Nuggets  .498;  +3.41;  8-2
  • Spurs  .494;   +3.76;   6-4
  • Blazers  .498;  +5.34;  9-1

The Celtics had the toughest schedule of the bunch and still managed the third best record and third best scoring margin in the league. An 8-2 finish was impressive concidering they were without KG. Of course, they lost the first game to the Bulls, so will now have to show off that nice 27-14 road record to get back in the series.

In the end, the two injuries will be too much to overcome for both the Celtics and Spurs, which is a shame because I have always said in order to be the best, you have to beat the best. The loss of KG and Manu will suck some of the fun out of this year’s playoffs.

With all this info, who will compete for a ring?

All signs clearly point to a Lakers/Cavs match up in the Finals. However, the Orlando Magic should not be overlooked. Their stats, across the board, suggest that they can get past the Cavs. They have won in seven of the top 10 toughest arenas to play in this year, including the Lakers and Celtics (#2 and 3, respectively). They also handed the Cavs their worse loss of the season, a 29 point beatdown.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Best Teams in the NBA — April 3rd

Posted: April 4th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Best Teams In The NBA, Competitors, Standings, Team | No Comments »

A handful of games left, yet only two games separate seeds 2-6 in the West. The Nuggets have the second seed in the West thanks to a five game win streak with wins in New Orleans and Dallas.

In the East, Boston has won four in a row, eight of 10, so it seems they are okay, with or without Kevin Garnett. Orlando just got a big win at home crushing the Cavs 116-89. That is the second straight loss for the Cavs, opening the door for the Lakeshow.

Thanks to ESPN for some Cavaliers stats — they are 2-6 vs Celtics, Lakers, and Magic. They are getting outscored 99 to 91 by their opponent on only 42.9% shooting; 59-9 vs all other opponents. This is what I have been talking about all year long. However, they did win in San Antonio by 11 but, there was no Tim Duncan or Manu Ginobili (both are back for Sunday’s rematch in Cleveland on ABC).

On March 10th, I mentioned that I was not impressed with the Utah Jazz’s 12 game win streak and that I wanted to see them beat quality opponents on the road. How did they follow up their 12-game win streak? Going  5-7 during their next 12 games. They lost road games to Atlanta, Miami, Orlando, Phoenix, Portland, and Denver. There only road win during that stretch was vs the Thunder. A horrible 14-23 road record is not going to get it done and they still have games in New Orleans, Dallas, San Antonio, and LA. Plus, if they are so unstoppable at home, what are they doing losing to the lowly T-Wolves?!? At this point, they are lucky they already have a four and a half game lead over Phoenix, but I smell an eighth seed finish and a match-up vs the Lakers. I would prefer Dallas, but will take whomever and I like my chances with home court.

Enough about the Jazz. Now what you have all been waiting for, the records:

Vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers  28-12 (.700)
  • Celtics  27-12 (.692)
  • Cavs    26-11 (.702)
  • Magic  24-14 (.631)
  • Spurs   19-20 (.487)

*This is the first time the Cavs have actually impressed and now have the best record of the bunch first vs +.500 teams. Of course they were down 41 at one point in Orlando. 28 of the Lakers 60 wins were to quality teams.

Stats vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers    PPG 101.7     Opp PPG 96.5   Point Differential +5.2
  • Celtics    PPG 97.3       Opp PPG 90.8   Point Differential +6.5
  • Cavs       PPG 97.0       Opp PPG 92.2   Point Differential +4.8
  • Magic     PPG 98.0       Opp PPG 95.2   Point Differential +2.8
  • Spurs     PPG 93.7       Opp PPG 95.2   Point Differential -1.49

*I cannot believe the Spurs inability to beat the good teams in the league. They are getting outscored by a point and a half per game and only manage 93.7 ppg.

Road Wins vs +.500 Teams:

  • Lakers Total of 12   (DEN, DAL, NOH (2), PHO, PHI, HOU (2), BOS, CLE, SAS, DET)
  • Celtics Total of 13 (HOU, DET (2), ATL (2), MIA, ORL, PHI, NOH, DAL, PHO, DEN, SAS)
  • Cavs Total of 10      (DAL, PHI, DEN, POR, UTA, DET, SAS, ATL, MIA, PHO)
  • Magic Total of 12  (DAL, PHI (2), POR, UTA, ATL (2), SAS, LAL, DEN, BOS, MIA)
  • Spurs Total of 10    (DEN, DAL, PHO (2), MIA, UTA, BOS, DET, HOU, ATL)

*I have counted Detroit as a +.500 team all year, so for all intensive purposes (I think they are a better team than their record indicates), they are still considered a +.500 team. While I am still not sure about the Cavs, they have won in Denver, Portland, Utah, and San Antonio, clearly some of the toughest places to play in. The Magic have done that as well, but add the Lakers and Celtics to their list of road victims. The Lakers still might be most impressive, having swept both road games in New Orleans and Houston, then knocked off three of top big four in their home venues: Boston, Cleveland, and San Antonio.

Vs Each Other

  • Lakers  6-3 so far (2-0 vs BOS; 2-0 vs CLE; 0-2 vs ORL; 2-1 vs SAS)
  • Celtics  5-6 so far (2-1 vs ORL; 2-2 vs CLE; 0-2 vs LAL; 1-1 vs SAS)
  • Cavs     3-6 so far (1-2 vs BOS; 0-2 vs LAL; 1-2 vs ORL; 1-0 vs SAS)
  • Magic   8-3 so far (2-0 vs LAL; 2-0 vs SAS; 2-1 vs CLE; 2-2 vs BOS)
  • Spurs   2-6 so far (1-1 vs BOS; 1-2 vs LAL; 0-2 vs ORL; 0-1 vs CLE)

*The Cavs have losing records vs everyone, but San Antonio.  That is why Sunday’s game will be a big match-up. The Magic have the most impressive record of the bunch; 8-3 with no games left. Oustanding!

Road Record

  • Lakers  28-11 (.718)
  • Celtics  26-13 (.667)
  • Cavs     25-14 (.641)
  • Magic   27-11 (.711)
  • Spurs   23-14 (.622)

*The Lakers still have the best road record after winning five of seven on this past road trip.

Strength of Schedule, Point Margin, Last 10:

  • Lakers .497;   +7.51;   7-3
  • Celtics .505;   +8.16;   8-2
  • Cavs    .496;   +8.58;   8-2
  • Magic  .500;   +7.51;   8-2
  • Spurs  .492;   +3.80;   5-5

The thing that stands out most is that the Spurs are the least impressive of the bunch (ESPN’s John Hollinger’s rating has them eighth in the league. I have seen it before. They are the one team that goes against the rule and defeats the purpose of this article. This is supposed to use these fancy records and stats to show the Lakers are supreme and the Spurs suck. However, just when I want to discount the Spurs, they always come on strong in the playoffs. Do not underestimate them, regardless of their below .500 record vs quality opponents.

Although that loss in Orlando was very troubling for Cleveland, they are still 36-1 at home, as impressive a stat as you will come by. They have a one game lead over the Lakers for the top spot in the league and if they can hold on, they would not have to win a single game to win it all. The Celtics went 3-9 last year to win it all, only having to win one game in LA. Our Lakers need to find a way to tie Cleveland (we own the tie-breaker) because they are near unbeatable at home — of course we gave them their only loss.

The Lakers remaining tough games: DEN, @POR, UTA.

Cleveland still has to play SAS, BOS, and a home and away vs Phili.

One game back with six games left is very doable and might also determine the league’s MVP.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

How good is the Lakers bench?

Posted: March 13th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Bench Mob, Best Teams In The NBA, Competitors, Kobe Bryant, Standings, Team | No Comments »

 

How important is the bench?

The Lakers bench might be the key to everything

 

I want to compare the top five teams — LAL, CLE, BOS, ORL, SAS — to see whose reserves play a bigger role.

I first want to point out that many will argue the significance of bench play come playoff time, considering most coaches use an 8-man rotation, thus lessening the impact of bench players.  I would argue that if that was the case, wouldn’t teams like the Magic and Celtics — who play their starters nearly ten minutes per game more than both the Lakers and Cavs, and 20 more minutes than the Spurs, but that is expected seeing the Spurs have one of the oldest teams in the league — have the advantage seeing their starting lineups do more for their respective teams?  Or, will guys like Kobe, Duncan, and Manu be fresh for the playoffs, having played fewer minutes over the course of the season?  Personally, in most cases I do not think the bench plays a significant role in a teams’ success in the playoffs; however, this Lakers team is constructed like no other and, as I will point out below, their bench play as important a role as any to the overall success of the team.

*Numbers as of 3/9/09

Points per 100 possessions:

  • The Lakers starters score 13.3 more points per 100 possessions than their reserves.
  • The Cavs starters score 5.7 more points per 100 possessions than their reserves.
  • The Celtics starters score 2.3 more points per 100 possessions than their reserves.
  • The Magic starters score 2.8 more points per 100 possessions than their reserves.
  • The Spurs starters score 1.1 less points per 100 possessions than their reserves.

*This is the most surprising stat of all, the Lakers starters actually play at a much faster pace, or at least score more efficiently than the bench mob, according to the 13.3 more points scored.

Bench scoring:

  • The Lakers bench scores 28% of their total points.
  • The Cavs bench scores 26% of their total points.
  • The Celtics bench scores 27% of their total points.
  • The Magic bench scores 22% of their total points.
  • The Spurs bench scores 33% of their total points.

*The Spurs lean on their bench to score significantly more than their counterparts, while the Magic’s glaring need is some more bench scoring.

Rebounds:

  • The Lakers bench grabs 33% of their total rebounds.
  • The Cavs bench grabs 32% of their total rebounds.
  • The Celtics bench 29% of their total rebounds.
  • The Magic bench 27% of their total rebounds.
  • The Spurs bench 39% of their total rebounds.

*Again, the Spurs rely heavily on their bench to contribute some rebounds; the Lakers and Cavs are not far behind; the Magic and Cavs do not have as strong rebounders coming off the bench.

Steals:

  • The Lakers bench snatches 52% of their total steals.
  • The Cavs bench snatches 27% of their total steals.
  • The Celtics bench snatches 33% of their total steals.
  • The Magic bench snatches 30% of their total steals.
  • The Spurs bench snatches 49% of their total steals.

*The Lakers bench, as I have documented before, relies heavily on their ability to force turnovers, more importantly, get steals so that they may get out on the fast break, evidenced by their 52% contribution.  Meanwhile, LeBron’s bench only contribute about a fourth of their steals.

Blocks:

  • The Lakers bench rejects 34% of their total blocks.
  • The Cavs bench rejects 25% of their total blocks.
  • The Celtics bench rejects 28% of their total blocks.
  • The Magic bench rejects 23% of their total blocks.
  • The Spurs bench rejects 41% of their total blocks.

*It is clear that the heavy minutes given to the Spurs subs (Gregg Popovich has always found a way to rest his stars more than other coaches) has a direct effect on what they contribute to the team.  It also shows that the Spurs bench is much deeper than even I thought.  The Magic prove once again they do not ask much of their bench.

Turnovers:

  • The Lakers bench contributes 36% of their total turnovers.
  • The Cavs bench contributes 28% of their total turnovers.
  • The Celtics bench contributes 28% of their total turnovers.
  • The Magic bench contributes 21% of their total turnovers.
  • The Spurs bench contributes 38% of their total turnovers.

*This is difficult to judge seeing the Magic play their bench less, so you would figure their turnovers would be lower, but does that mean their bench is more careful than the other benches?

 

All in all, I would conclude that the Lakers bench clearly plays a vital role in their success, and will continue to play important minutes, even as Phil Jackson shortens his rotation for the playoffs.  The idea behind our deep bench is to change the pace of the game, tire out the opponent, and keep our best players fresh for the fourth quarter, in case they are needed.  The bench has also proved, more times than not, that they are more than capable of not only keeping the game even, but extending a lead or cutting into a deficit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Are the young Blazers really a threat?

Posted: March 11th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Competitors, Standings, Team | No Comments »

Lakers Trail Blazers Basketball

I was reading up on somethign the Elias Sports Bureau reported.  They said the Lakers have lost seven straight vs Portland (the longest road losing streak vs anyone), 20 of 26 regular-season games at the Rose Garden, and 26 of 32 at Portland, going back to ‘93.

After watching that beat down, and hearing that the Lakers have won only six out of the last 32 games in Portland, it makes you realize that if the Blazers can get back into the fourth seed and win home court vs the Jazz (another great home team, bad road team) then they would meet up with the Lakers in the 2nd round, and who knows.  At that point, we struggle so much at the Rose Garden, that they would only need to sneak one game from us (the first game of any series is always the most up for grabs — an Any Given Sunday type atmosphere) and win out their home games to steal the series.  The West will certainly not be as easy to win as our large lead over every team suggests (currently seven games ahead of San Antonio, 3/11/09).  Plus, with Bynum’s status still up in the air (anyone hear anything positive on this guy lately?) and now Lamar reverting back to his mysterious self, who knows how we will stand up in the playoffs.

Now when we might meet up with the Blazers varies due to another tight race in the West.  They are three games out of the 2nd seed, but only a game and a half away from falling down to the 8th seed.  In the West, lose three straight and move from a close fight for 2nd, all the way down to the 7th seed (just ask Denver); and win 12 straight to find yourself with home court in the first round instead of lottery bound.

The Blazers slow the game down, limit a teams’ possessions (a great tool vs a high octane offense like the Lakers — think of a great running game that is used to counter and limit the possessions of a great QB like Peyton Manning), have a big edge in defensive rebounds per game over their opponent, and let’s face it, Brandon Roy is a legit Superstar who plays big when they need it most (two game winners already this year).  They put the smack down on us and made a big statement.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Best Teams In The NBA – Mar 10th

Posted: March 10th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Best Teams In The NBA, Competitors, Standings, Team | No Comments »

So, is it time to anoint the Jazz as a legit contender.  Before we do so, let us analyze the 12 game win streak.  I want to start by making sure everyone understands, you win 12 straight in this league, and you are a very good team.  However, who have they played.  Huge home wins vs the Lakers, Celtics, Hornets, Hawks, Rockets, and Nuggets.  But we already know they are a good home team.  Since they do not have the best record in the league, they will have to win games on the road.  They are 13-17 on the road this year, and during this road trip they have wins vs the Wolves, Warriors, Raptors, and Pacers…are you impressed by that?  I’m not.  While Deron Williams has been great lately, and Boozer’s return has obviously re-energized the teams’ play, I’m still skeptical.  Maybe I will add them to this list if they can knock off some quality opponents on the road.  They will certainly have a chance as 11 of their last 18 games will be on the road; 10 of those will be against teams well above .500 (ATL, MIA, ORL, PHO, POR, DEN, NOH, DAL, SAS, LAL).  Now is your chance to really make some noise.

I have new, revealing data regarding the Big Five in the league.  I broke down their record again vs the good teams in the league and it looks like this:

Vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers  22-10 (.688)
  • Celtics  20-10 (.667)
  • Cavs    18-10 (.642)
  • Magic  16-13 (.552)
  • Spurs   16-15 (.516)

*The Lakers and Celtics still reign supreme, but the Cavs are knocking good opponents out left and right lately.

Stats vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers    PPG 102.9     Opp PPG 97.7   Point Differential +5.2
  • Celtics    PPG 97.1       Opp PPG 90.8   Point Differential +6.3
  • Cavs       PPG 96.9       Opp PPG 92.5   Point Differential +4.4
  • Magic     PPG 97.8       Opp PPG 95.7   Point Differential +2.1
  • Spurs     PPG 94.3       Opp PPG 95.1   Point Differential -0.8

*The Spurs have a troubling point differential vs good teams.  It would appear they are beating up on the bad teams and playing .500 ball vs the good teams (this is true as they are 16-15 vs +.500 teams, as seen above).  However, only a fool would discount the Spurs, and they are still properly considered a threat to the Lakers.

Road Wins vs +.500 Teams:

  • Lakers Total of 8   (DEN, DAL, NOH (2), PHO, HOU, BOS, CLE)
  • Celtics Total of 11 (HOU, DET (2), ATL, MIA, ORL, PHI, NOH, DAL, PHO, DEN)
  • Cavs Total of 8      (DAL, DEN, POR, UTA, DET, SAS, ATL, MIA)
  • Magic Total of 10  (DAL, PHI (2), POR, UTA, ATL, SAS, LAL, DEN, BOS)
  • Spurs Total of 8    (DEN, DAL, PHO (2), MIA, UTA, BOS, DET)

*The Celtics are running away with it enjoying 11 impressive road wins, two of them without KG.  The Cavs are in the midst of a stretch of 8 of 10 games on the road and won 4 of 6 so far.

Vs Each Other

  • Lakers  5-3 so far (2-0 vs BOS; 2-0 vs CLE; 0-2 vs ORL; 1-1 vs SAS)
  • Celtics  4-5 so far (2-1 vs ORL; 2-1 vs CLE; 0-2 vs LAL; 0-1 vs SAS)
  • Cavs     2-5 so far (1-2 vs BOS; 0-2 vs LAL; 0-1 vs ORL; 1-0 vs SAS)
  • Magic   6-2 so far (2-0 vs LAL; 2-0 vs SAS; 1-0 vs CLE; 1-2 vs BOS)
  • Spurs   2-4 so far (1-0 vs BOS; 1-1 vs LAL; 0-2 vs ORL; 0-1 vs CLE)

*Every team but the Lakers and Magic have a losing record vs one another.  There is still a big Lakers/Spurs match up on TNT Thursday night in San Antonio.  The Magic are 4-0 vs the Lakers and Spurs.  Every time I try to doubt them — they are young, have no one that has ever won anything — I find reasons that make me think they have a shot.

Road Record

  • Lakers  21-9 (.700)
  • Celtics  23-9 (.718)
  • Cavs     22-12 (.647)
  • Magic   22-10 (.687)
  • Spurs   20-12 (.625)

*The Lakers #1 road record a week ago took a hit with losses in Denver, Phoenix, and now Portland.  Houston and San Antonio take place over the next two days.

Strength of Schedule, Point Margin, Last 10:

  • Lakers .493;   +7.89;   7-3
  • Celtics .514;   +8.84;   6-4
  • Cavs    .503;   +9.34;   8-2
  • Magic  .490;   +7.69;   7-3
  • Spurs  .494;   +6.76;   7-3

I know by now I sound like a broken record, but tell me the biggest issue come playoff time does not appear to be health.  Everyone is banged up, but there is a difference between banged up and injured.  Injuries keep players from playing.  Updated injuries are:  Cavs (Wallace) replaced by Joe Smith; Lakers (Bynum) replaced by Josh Powell; Celtics (KG) replaced by Glenn Davis; Magic (Nelson) replaced by Rafer Alston; and Spurs (Manu) replaced by Drew Gooden.  Lakers biggest issue with moving Lamar to the starting lineup is that he is not always in with the 2nd unit and the bench mob has struggled as of late.  It should come as no surprise that LO is the engine that makes them run, and while he has struggled the past few games, so have the Lakers.  A good road win (tomorrow night vs Houston?) is just what the doctor ordered, but they will have to do so without Lamar, who is serving his one game bogus suspension.  I also wanted to note that the Spurs have raised their point margin by 3.09 since the last time I posted this article.  The best teams get hot at the end of the season, and it would appear the top teams are surging.  Now is as good a time as any to make a statement.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Lakers lose out on best record at the break

Posted: February 13th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Standings | No Comments »

Thanks to a heartbreaking loss in Utah on Wednesday by the Lake Show and a thrilling victory for the Celtics in Dallas (thrilling for Boston fans anyway), the Celtics now have the best record in the league at 44-11, narrowly edging out the Lakers (42-10) by 1/2 a game.  However, the Lakers record is .808 while the Celtics is at .800, so the way I see it, the Lakers own the tie breaker and have one less loss, therefore giving them the edge going into all-star weekend.  I would say they are still favorites to edge out the hated boys in green.  Go purple and gold!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Why do people continue to downplay the regular season?

Posted: February 12th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Andrew Bynum, Competitors, Kobe Bryant, Kobe Haters, Laker Haters, Lamar Odom, Pau Gasol, Standings, Trevor Ariza | No Comments »

Mike Freeman, CBSSports.com: “Great win, Los Angeles. Congratulations. You win a lot of big regular season games, Los Angeles. But while you may fool some of the ex-player suck ups at ESPN, you’re not fooling me again. We’ve seen this movie before. The Lakers and Ko-Me Bryant will impress in the regular season, maybe even get to the Finals. That’s what they do. Then the postseason will arrive and they’ll get bullied and punk’d by one of the tough teams from the East. Just like last year. If the Lakers play Boston in the Finals, they’ll get smoked. Just like last year. Los Angeles still doesn’t possess the inside toughness to beat one of the great teams from the East when it really counts. So congratulations, Los Angeles. You’ve earned a title. Best team in the regular season.”

After reading this, as a fan of the Lake Show, I almost didn’t know what to say or do.  I wanted to email the guy and go off on him.  Instead, I write.

I never understand why people give so many excuses for a loss.  Man up already!  Why down play the wins when they may in fact be the reason the Lakers win it all this year, who now own the tie breakers and home court if they face either Boston or Cleveland in the Finals.  While even I will admit that I get a little excited when my team goes 6-0 on a road trip that includes the two best teams in the league, and I will also admit that this in no way guarantees a championship.  However, let’s not take away from what they did.  As stated by ESPN.com, no team has beat back to back +.800 teams, this late into the season, on the road.

More importantly, I saw three big problems that were glaringly obvious in last year’s loss to the Celtics:

1) No Andrew Bynum

SOLUTION – reports are he should be back by the playoffs and, for now, we will assume he gets most of his form back come Finals.

2) The team was weak on the inside as Mr. Freeman notes above

SOLUTION – defend the paint, something the Lakers did to LeBron throughout and as far as being “bullied” or “punk’d”, is it me or did the Lakers defeat the two best teams in the league on the road under impossible circumstances?

Could Ariza be the wild card that pushes the Lakers to the top?

Could Ariza be the wild card that pushes the Lakers over the top?

3) Lack of home court advantage

SOLUTION – by becoming the best team in the regular season — which clearly we are seeing that CBSSports.com writer Mike Freeman so eloquently proclaimed us to be — the Lakers would secure home court come Finals and thus can exploit an advantage they did not have last year.

These three factors (four if you count a healthy Trevor Ariza; five if you count Pau & Lamar playing tough like they did the past two games; six if you count the fact the Celtics are missing both Posey and PJ — two tough guy contributors who “bullied” the Lakers last year — and the Cavs continue on with players that have never won anything, while Kobe has three rings and Pau has a gold medal, along with that guy Phil who has nine rings) all contribute to a solid bet that the Lakers are primed for a strong finish to the playoffs!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Best Teams in the NBA – Feb 10th

Posted: February 10th, 2009 | Author: Jeff Miller | Filed under: Best Teams In The NBA, Competitors, Standings, Team | No Comments »

It actually looks like there is a five team race for the top spot after the San Antonio Spurs beat the Boston Celtics in Boston.  I am giving the Orlando Magic the benefit of the doubt that they will still be able to compete without Jameer Nelson.  The same goes for the Los Angeles Lakers without Andrew Bynum.

I have always said that winning at home does not impress me. You can tell the great teams right away by the ones that have a winning record on the road. I extended it this year to your record vs good teams in the league (+.500). As such, I wanted to know what each team’s record is against the best teams in the league, and this is what I found out. Stat’s below.

 

Vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers  20-6 (.769)
  • Celtics 17-7 (.708)
  • Cavs   14-8 (.636)
  • Magic  14-9 (.609)
  • SA      13-13 (.500)

*None of those records are bad, but clearly the Lakers and Celtics have no problem vs the tougher teams in the league.

Road Wins vs +.500 Teams

  • Lakers Total of 8  (DEN, DAL, NOH (2), PHO, HOU, BOS, CAV)
  • Celtics Total of 7 (HOU, DET (2), ATL, MIA, ORL, PHI)
  • Cavs Total of 5   (DAL, DEN, POR, UTA, DET)
  • Magic Total of 8  (DAL, PHI, POR, UTA, ATL, SA, LAL, DEN)
  • SA Total of 7      (DEN, DAL, PHO (2), MIA, UTA, BOS)

Vs Each Other

  • Lakers  4-3 so far (2-0 vs BOS; 1-0 vs CLE; 0-2 vs ORL; 1-1 vs SA)
  • Celtics  3-4 so far (2-0 vs ORL; 1-1 vs BOS; 0-2 vs LAL; 0-1 vs SA)
  • Cavs    1-3 so far (1-1 vs BOS; 0-1 vs LAL; 0-1 vs ORL; 0-0 vs SA)
  • Magic   5-2 so far (2-0 vs LAL; 2-0 vs SA; 1-0 vs CLE; 0-2 vs BOS)
  • SA       2-3 so far (1-0 vs BOS; 1-1 vs LAL; 0-2 vs ORL; 0-0 vs CLE)
*No one really stands out, with the exception of the Magic who are 5-0 vs LAL, SA, and CLE.

Road Record

  • Lakers  18-5 (.782)
  • Celtics 18-7 (.720)
  • Cavs    16-9 (.640)
  • Magic   18-7 (.720)
  • SA       16-8 (.667)

Strength of Schedule and Point Margin

  • Lakers .500; +8.62
  • Celtics .503; +9.3
  • Cavs   .486; +9.9
  • Magic  .485; +8.48
  • SA      .498; +3.16

So, after the two most impressive road wins by the Lakers this past week, they have the best record in the league, best road record, best record vs the other top teams, most road wins vs quality opponents, second best record vs the better teams, a solid point margin of +8.62, and while they are tied for the 15th toughest schedule in the league, it is second amongst the other top teams.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz